Patent
Posted by English Learner on March 03, 2003
Hello there,
I
browsed a website and ran into certain paragraph about patent. I don't quite understand
its meaning. Could you please help me out? It is cited as following:
Section 103. Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter
(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not
identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of
this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to
be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a
whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to
a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject
matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the
manner in which the invention was made.
1. What is patentability? Any difference from patent?
2. What does
this paragraph mean? Could you analyze the paragraph? It's way too long to be
understood.
3. What does the last sentence mean? Does it mean the refuted
present patent applicant can't deny the patentability of the prior art because
of its close similarity? Namely, A is denied because A has similiarity with B,
which has patent. A can't use this excuse of similarity against B claiming that
B shouldn't get patent either. Am I right? I am pretty confused now. Thank you
for your great help.
English Learner
- Patent R.
Berg 03/03/03
- patent English Learner 03/03/03
- Patent and legalese TheFallen
03/03/03
- Hey
Mr Prejudiced Lewis 03/03/03
- It's not a contract R. Berg 03/03/03
- Experiential Prejudice TheFallen 03/03/03
- It's not a contract R. Berg 03/03/03
- Patent and legalese - Clarifiying/Correcting. TheFallen 03/03/03
- Hey
Mr Prejudiced Lewis 03/03/03
- Patent and legalese TheFallen
03/03/03
- patent English Learner 03/03/03