The Family Jewels
Posted by ESC on January 31, 2002
In Reply to: The Family Jewels posted by Word Camel on January 31, 2002
: I was wondering about this phrase as it used to describe male genitalia.
: For years I've wondered specifically if this might relate to the German word "Schmuck" meaning ornament, decoration or jewels and the Yiddish word "Schmuck" meaning penis. I understand that the Yiddish word is related to the word for "snake" - which would make sense.
: Anyone have any insights?
: Thanks,
: C
JEWELS - "Many of the terms for the male genitals refer to the value of these organs - thought by some to be man's most precious possessions. These include 'family jewels,' 'jewelry,' 'trinkets,' and 'treasure' (also used for the female genitals). Even the Yiddish term 'schmuck' is a pejorative use of the low German term for 'jewels' and implications of value shape such other euphemisms for male genitals as 'private property,' 'ladies' treasure,' and 'ladies' delight." From the "Wordsworth Book of Euphemism" by Judith S. Neaman and Carole G. Silver (Wordsworth Editions, Hertfordshire, 1995)
That reminds me of a scene from "My Favorite Year." Paraphrasing here. Alan Swann (Peter O'Toole) accidentally goes into the Ladies Room. Lil (Selma Diamond) tells him, "This is for ladies only." He answers, "And this, mum, is also for ladies only. But sometimes I have to run a little water through it."
- The Family Jewels Michael 02/01/02
- "Putz"
and "schmuck" R. Berg 02/01/02
- Size Doesn't
Matter Word Camel 02/01/02
- Size Doesn't Matter The Fallen
02/01/02
- Just out of curiosity... Word Camel 02/01/02
- Just out of
curiosity... The Fallen 02/01/02
- Useful to know Word Camel
02/01/02
- Useful to know ESC 02/01/02
- Useful to know Word Camel
02/01/02
- Just out of
curiosity... The Fallen 02/01/02
- Size and Yiddish (not for the delicate of constitution) The Fallen 02/01/02
- Just out of curiosity... Word Camel 02/01/02
- Size Doesn't Matter The Fallen
02/01/02
- Size Doesn't
Matter Word Camel 02/01/02
- "Putz"
and "schmuck" R. Berg 02/01/02