'reasonable and prudent man' test
Posted by Ward on November 25, 2004
There is in US jurisprudence a 'reasonable and prudent man' test which is used to determine if an individual should have forseen the consequences of an action. Is this a US concept, or is it taken from English common law or prior law in the UK?
- 'reasonable and prudent man' test Lewis 25/November/04
- 'reasonable and prudent man' test Ward 25/November/04
- Scots law and the 'reasonable and prudent man' test? keith rennie 29/November/04
- Um ... prudent person, now Bob 25/November/04
- Um ... prudent person, now Brian from Shawnee 26/November/04
- Um ... prudent person, now Lotg 26/November/04
- Dear Prudence Lewis 26/November/04
- For what it's worth DH 26/November/04
- Claims and lots Ward 27/November/04
- Claims and lots DH 27/November/04
- Speed limit platypus 30/November/04
- Claims and lots DH 27/November/04
- Claims and lots Ward 27/November/04
- For what it's worth DH 26/November/04
- Dear Prudence Lewis 26/November/04
- Um ... prudent person, now Lotg 26/November/04
- Um ... prudent person, now Brian from Shawnee 26/November/04
- 'reasonable and prudent man' test Ward 25/November/04