phrases, sayings, idioms and expressions at

Home | Search the website Search | Discussion Forum Home|

Why his final comment ignored the past 150 years of American history?

Posted by Sphinx on August 24, 2003

In Reply to: Learning recipes? posted by EAH on August 24, 2003

: Read up on mid nineteenth century filibusters in the USA national senate.
: To prevent a vote on an issue, senators would engage in long rambling debates, which were reputed to go on for days. Apparently, the speaker could talk about anything, not just the merits/demerits of an issue. Reputedly, women sat in the galleries, notebooks in hand, as senators read aloud the recipe books of mothers and wives.
: (for derivation of the word filibuster see

: The husband's sense of humor is decidely off-color. It's not humorous. Especially his final comment, ignoring of the past 150 years of American history.

COuld you explain more on "recent"?