Posted by TheUnlurker on April 23, 2002

In Reply to: Aromatic? posted by ESC on April 23, 2002

: : : : : I wonder if there's a parallel adjectives for "smell" in the pattern of "see-visible;hear-adible;eat-edible." Thank you for your help.

: : : : Sight - visible

: : : : Sound - audible

: : : : Touch - tangible

: : : : Smell - olfactible (I think - this needs checking, because it's based on my memory, and doesn't feature in my abridged OED)

: : : : Taste - to be strict, edible doesn't really fit too well with the others in my opinion, because it means "capable of being eaten without harm", rather than "possessing a taste which can be perceived". Again though it doesn't feature in my dictionary, I'd place a small bet on something like "gustible" or maybe "gustable".

: : : : I'm sure that someone with the full OED will soon confirm or deny the above.

: : : concerning smell - olfactory, osmatic From the "Writer's Digest Flip Dictionary: for when you know what you want to say but can't think of the word," by Barbara Ann Kipfer, Ph.D., (Writer's Digest Books, Cincinnati, Ohio, 2000). Both are adjectives. The World Book Dictionary lists olfactory also as a noun -- the ability to smell.

: : : I don't think we're there yet. What do you say R. Berg?

: : I've just found both olfactible (and olfactable) and gustable (but not gustible) in an on-line 1922 edition of Roget's International Thesaurus. I'm not entirely convinced by either, though, but nor am I convinced by "olfactory" which to me means "pertaining to the sense of smell" rather than "having a smell which can be perceived" - and I think the original post was about adjectives relating to perceptibility. OED... heeeeelllp!

: olid -- having a strong scent. "Because the perfume was olid, everyone noticed it." From "Weird Words" by Irwin M. Berent and Rod L. Evans (Berkley Books, New York, 1995). Or how about aromatic.

: Smell - aromatic

There are, of course, the prosaic

Smell - smellable
Taste - tasteable
Touch - touchable
Sight - seeable

"Sound" doesn't correspond with "smell", "taste", "touch" and "sight", (there is no "sense of sound") but "hearing" does, giving:
Hearing - hearable

Am I making things too simple?