|
|
Re: SuggestionsPosted by Gary on July 31, 2003 In Reply to: Re: Suggestions posted by GPP on July 31, 2003 : : : It was the 'fell' and 'swoop' comment that I was really asking about... : : See the commentaries in the thread begun by Peter on July 25. : : : : I suspect you are probably right about that, but this wasn't really my point. Rather, I was suggesting you refer visitors not directly to the Forum, but to the Search box. I was addressing the situation where people come first to the Meanings/Origins page, and find information that seems wrong to them--such as this comment from Mark about the entry for 'bad hair day': : : I think saying something to the effect of "For additional commentary, discussion (or arguments), try Searching in the box provided above for one or more keywords from this phrase" would in many instances solve both the problem of visitors going away unhappy because they didn't like the information given at Meanings/Origins, and the problem of other visitors going away happy but with information that may not be as correct or complete as it might be. If nothing else, it would give them the opportunity to see what has already been discussed, before jumping feet first into the Forum. : Okay, now I see my Search suggestion won't work, with the way the search function is currently structured--searching at Meanings/Origins yields results ONLY from that area of the site, and can't find any of the discussion forum entries; and apparently vice versa. Is it possible to consolidate Search so that it will always search the Archives, the current forum, AND the Meanings/Origins section? That's technically fairly straightforward. I think there's benefit in them being kept separate though. |