So, dear friends, in modern english
Posted by R. Berg on March 16, 2003
In Reply to: So, dear friends, in modern english posted by jee-an on March 16, 2003
: are the structures of 'Not all..to be (or Do )sth else'
: and 'All sth to
be (or do) not sth else' still in used side by side ? coz too me they are mean
two difference things. And I even don't know if the way to understand 'All that
glitters is not gold' as 'Not all that glitters is gold' still conventional in
modern english. If it is , then how should we differenciate the meanings of those
two structures.
: By the way, I have a wild guess that 'Not all that glitters is gold'could be rephrased in full as 'it is not that all that glitters is gold'.
: Thank you all
Your last statement is correct. Logically, "It is not that all that glitters is gold" says the same thing as "Not all that glitters is gold." We could also say "It is not true that all that glitters is gold."
I can't answer the first question because I don't know what you mean by "sth else."
- Logic reprised TheFallen 03/16/03
- Logic vs. reality R. Berg 03/16/03
- Reality vs. reality TheFallen 03/17/03
- Reality vs. reality
R. Berg 03/17/03
- Reality vs. reality TheFallen
03/17/03
- .
. . defending her sincerity R. Berg 03/17/03
- . . . defending
her sincerity TheFallen 03/17/03
- A really ordinary example R. Berg
03/17/03
- A really ordinary example TheFallen 03/17/03
- A really ordinary example R. Berg
03/17/03
- . . . defending
her sincerity TheFallen 03/17/03
- .
. . defending her sincerity R. Berg 03/17/03
- Reality vs. reality TheFallen
03/17/03
- Reality vs. reality
R. Berg 03/17/03
- Reality vs. reality TheFallen 03/17/03
- Logic vs. reality R. Berg 03/16/03