Browse phrases beginning with: [A][B][C][D][E][F][G][H][I][J][K][L][M][N][O][P][Q][R][S][T][U,V][W][X,Y,Z] The living daylightsMeaning A person's eyes; more recently, the life force or consciousness. Origin The release of the 1987 film The Living Daylights, the fifteenth in the James Bond series, reawakened usage of this old phrase. When we refer to someone having the living daylights beaten, scared, or knocked out of them, we just mean that they have been badly beaten or scared, or knocked unconscious. The imagery is of someone being so discomforted as to lose the power of sight. Like similar phrases, for example 'beat the stuffing out of', the phrase is often used with an air of exaggeration and not always meant to be taken literally. The original 18th century meaning of 'daylights' was quite specific and literal; it meant 'the eyes'. That meaning is now long forgotten and few people are aware of it. The word was occasionally used to denote other items to do with seeing - spectacles, windows etc. (see daylight robbery), but usage of 'daylights' was largely limited to the eyes and to threats to close them by force. The first known citation of the word is one such example; in Henry Fielding's novel Amelia, 1752:
Francis Grose, in A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue, 1796, reinforces the pugilistic usage:
The 'eyes' meaning of the word was going out of use even in the 19th century, hence the emergence then of 'knocking or beating the daylights out of someone'. The phrase is intended to indicate a severe beating, but perhaps not literally that severe. The lack of appreciation of the 'eyes' meaning led to the later 'beat the living daylight' variant. When referring to eyes, 'daylights' makes sense, whereas the singular 'daylight' doesn't, unless the intent is to punch only one eye that is. The first usage of 'beating the daylights out' that I can find is in Augustus Peirce's poem The Rebelliad, 1842:
By the time that the intensifier 'living' was added, the phrase had lost all association with eyes. The earliest known version of that form was printed in several US newspapers in the 1890s, for example, The Decatur Morning Review, September 1890:
|