|
|
Re: Generic statementPosted by R. Berg on May 28, 2001 In Reply to: Re: Generic statement posted by ESC on May 28, 2001 : : Hi! : : Thank you very much for your explanation last time. : : I have another question. : : 1. A dog is a friendly animal. : : I understand all of them are correct and people tend to use sentence type #2 a lot. : : How about next group as generic statements? : : 1. A Chinese is a good cook. : : Do all of these sentences sound correct? My American friend told me that a sentence #4 is good, but sentences #1 and #2 doesn't sound right. Is she right? : : Thanks again. I appreciate your help. Have a nice holiday! : : All the best, : : K Yone : My opinions as a speaker of American English: : The first group sounds OK. : In the second group, No. 4 is the only one that sounds 100 percent OK to me. I am another native speaker of American English. I agree with your American friend and with the analysis above. Here's a little more: "Chinese are good cooks" sounds wrong without "the," but "Italians are good cooks" is OK. These are OK with or without "the": Germans, Swedes, Africans, Hawaiians, Eskimos, Egyptians, Canadians, New Zealanders, New Yorkers, Mexicans, Texans, Finns, Koreans, Spaniards, Israelis, Chileans. These need "the": Japanese, Portuguese, English, French, Spanish, Irish, Dutch. I don't know of any rule for this. From these examples, it seems that the rule is that "the" is not needed if the name of the population looks like an ordinary plural, ending in -s.
|