Posted by Valeriy on November 17, 2006
In Reply to: Re: In spades posted by Smokey Stover on November 16, 2006
: : : In spades
: : : I know there were already discussions regarding this expression and I refer to one of them seeking a clarification to one of the explanations given:
: : : QUOTE
: : : By extension beyond cards, "in spades" expresses a decisive, complete, no-doubt defeat. If I suffer a (real or imagined) injury from you, and I retaliate with disproportionate vigor, I have paid you back "in spades."
: : : UNQUOTE
: : : In this explanation what is "the defeat" is referred to? To that one who suffers or to the opponent?
: : : Further, how would you interpret "in spades" in the following context:
: : : "There are three essential conditions necessary to produce a pandemic. First, a new virus must arise from an animal reservoir, such that humans have no natural immunity to it. Second, the virus must evolve to be capable of killing human beings efficiently. Third, the virus must succeed in jumping efficiently from one human to the next. For the virus, it,s one small step to man, but one giant leap to mankind. So far, conditions one and two have been met in spades. Three strikes and we,re out."
: : : Thank you.
: : Just substitute the word "completely" for "in spades" and it will be clear.
: DO as Bob says. Related English idioms recited here just to confuse you are, "and then some," and "and how!" Like "in spades," they can be taken to express a sort of informal comparative, a maximizing of the condition cited.