|
|
Re: United Fruit Co.Posted by Bob on March 02, 2000 In Reply to: Re: United Fruit Co. posted by Tomar on March 02, 2000
: : : I believe this is the answer: : :: That doesn't help...am I the only one who doesn't see the words "Banana Republic" in that whole article? : : I'm afraid you are Steve old chap cos its up there, in big upper case letters. I would agree that it's not much of an explanation as to why a banana republic is so called and what are its defining characteristics. : No, I understand what's Steve is saying. He doesn't mean "Banana Republic" isn't there in your response, he says it's not in the article. Which it's not. The article is about banana production and distribution, it has nothing to do with the phrase. For decades, the U.S. bullied the small banana-growing countries in Central America (within our "sphere of influence") on behalf of United Fruit, who was the de facto government. To further their corporate aims, we resorted to the occasional overthrow of a government (e.g., Guatemala in the '50s by the CIA.) The result of the US manipulation in the region was a series of unstable, puppet governments, mostly military juntas, who were US "clients." The leaders, puffed-up little dictators with a chest full of medals they awarded to themselves, exercised laws that were somewhat arbitrary and self-serving. The term "banana republic" stems from this history. |