Posted by Smokey Stover on March 25, 2004
In Reply to: 'a clean sheet of paper' posted by Ward Fredericks on March 25, 2004
: In a message concerning a decision someone had to make, I used the expression --- 'you now have a clean sheet of paper'. That's a phrase used in the US to denote a situation where a decision can be made without reference to prior events or be limited or affected by past happenings. Most decisions have historical connections and precedent which serve to limit options. Some decisions (they rarely occur) are wholly open -- they can be considered to have no predisposition.
: Is this expression used elsewhere? If not, is there another phrase which indicates a decision which is not dependent on other factors?
What about "carte blanche"? Okay, so that really is the same thing, a clean sheet of paper. Tabula rasa has some of the same connotation, although it perhaps too often connotes by now a condition of the mind. (The theory used to be that the mind of a newborn was a blank slate, to be written on by the experience of life and the teachings of parents and others.) But I'm not sure that there is such a thing as a decision that can be made without reference to prior events and with "no predisposition." Every decision (except perhaps decision by default?) is made by a person. "Carte blanche" or "a blank piece of paper" are usually given to someone who thus receives the authority to make whatever decision he wants. This authority is given to people who are thought capable of making a good decision, that is, have the experience and the sense of responsibility to be trusted with an important decision. If the decision is unimportant then it probably doesn't matter how clean may be the piece of paper, or how blank the slate. And no matter how blank the paper, it's hard to imagine how a human being could make a decision without reference at least to one's own past history, with its accumulation of experience, taste, preferences, habits and opinions. Does a perfect dilemma exist? If so, how can it be solved? Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa, devoted a number of pages to the discussion of different kinds of decisions or choices that an individual has to make, or might have to, with a lot of attention to which ones are "free" and which are contingent. The quotations marks are mine, and reflect my own bias. SS