|
|
Re: Slight TangentPosted by Joe Pessell on January 18, 2000 In Reply to: Re: Slight Tangent posted by ESC on January 15, 2000 : : : : I'm hoping not to curve this educational and fun forum
but I have an arguement to solve with friends. : : : Neither the term 'junior' or 'II' are used in the UK and if there is a rule it is 'don't use that silly American expression'. I sould say that if you refered to a yound person as '******** junior' they would construe it as a term of abuse and punch you on the nose - in impolite society such as down in the public bar at the 'Dog and Duck' pub. : : : Hope this helps. : : I don't think you understood the question. : A baby boy who is given the exact name of his father is a "junior." If the baby is given the name of an uncle, for example, the child is a II. He is a junior only if he is named after his father. Some men drop the "junior" after the "senior" dies. Women usually don't use junior/senior, but I know of one famous family -- Nancy Sinatra Sr. and Jr. -- where the did just that. I have it from someone I work with (a IV) that his Grandfather was a "junior", but that his father was a "III" and that he is a "IV". I suggested that after "III" was born, "junior" would have become "II"; but he says no, "junior" remained "junior". Additionally, there were others in the family with his name, yet they did not fall under the numbering system because there was a generation between. Hmmm. I guess he would know... |