Posted by Jee-an on March 13, 2003
In Reply to: Re: All that glitters is not gold posted by ESC on March 13, 2003
: : Hi everyone, I am a foreigner to english.
: : I have just seen the meaning of 'All that glitters is not gold' which is 'a showy article may not nessarily be valuable.' To me that means some showy articles are valuable. So in other words, some objetcs that glitter are gold.
: : Now my question is if my understanding of that is acceptable, then what is the difference, if there is, between 'All that glitters is not gold', and 'Not all that glitters is gold'?
: : Thank you.
: ALL THAT GLITTERS IS NOT GOLD - "The appearance of a thing or person can be deceptive. This proverb is similar to the L*tin: Non omne quod nitet aurum est. ('Not all that shines is gold.') The proverb was used by Chaucer (c. 1374-87), by Cervantes in 'Don Quixote' (1605-15), and by Shakespeare in 'The Merchant of Venice' in 1596. First attested in the United States in the 'Winthrop Papers' ." From "Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs and Sayings" by Gregory Y. Titelman (Random House, New York, 1996).
: There's more discussion in the archives under "gold."
Thank You !Sir/madam.
So 'All that glitters is not gold' means
the same as 'Not all that shines is gold'. But again I found it difficulty to
accept that 'All that glitters is not gold' means 'Not all that glitters is gold'
since 'all that glitters is not gold' can be understood as everything that glitters
is not gold, but when one says 'not all that glitters is gold', one is implying
that 'some objects that glitter are gold'(at least).
thank you again.