Signal Strength and Readability: 5x5
Posted by Bruce Kahl on November 17, 2002
In Reply to: "Five by Five" & "Hawaii Five 0" posted by Steve on November 17, 2002
: I did think the 5 by 5 phrase was related to "your coming in loud and clear" but why 5 x 5?
: Why not 6x6 or 7x7?
: Is there something on an old radio where 5 was the strongest signal or something? And why two number?
: Do the two numbers relate to an "x" & "y" axis?
From a number of ham radio sites;
"The term five by five refers to the two measures of signal strength and readability; it is derived from older HAM radio instruments that were scaled from zero to 10 with 10 being the strongest. A five by five would be interpreted as 50 percent signal strength and easily readable, perhaps with some static or band clutter. A 10 by two would have a strong signal, but be broken and hard to understand, while a two by 10 would contain a weak signal, but be perfectly clear. A 10 by 10 would be very strong and crystal clear."
- So Where Did "HAM" come from as a word to describe amateur radio stations? Bruce Kahl 11/17/02
- Hawaii 5-0 Bob 11/17/02
- Hawaii 5-0 R. Berg 11/17/02
- EVERYBODY STOP ERASING! Bob 11/18/02
- Why not start at beginnning post? Karl 11/18/02
- Because... Word Camel 11/18/02
- Moreover TheFallen 11/18/02
- Furthermore . . . R. Berg 11/19/02
- Moreover TheFallen 11/18/02
- Because... Word Camel 11/18/02
- Why not start at beginnning post? Karl 11/18/02
- EVERYBODY STOP ERASING! Bob 11/18/02
- Hawaii 5-0 R. Berg 11/17/02
- Hawaii 5-0 Bob 11/17/02