Ps
Posted by Word Camel on October 12, 2002 In Reply to: Re:
think (n.) posted by R. Berg on October 12, 2002
: : : :
: : : : : : : : Can anyone help solve an office argument?
: : : : : : : : :
: : : Is the following phrase correct:
: : : : : : : : : : : : If you think
that then you've got another thing coming;
: : : : : : : : : : : : Or should
it be
: : : : : : : : : : : : If you think that then you've got another think
coming?
: : : : : : : : : : : It is definitely "another think".
: : : : :
: : : : : No evidence, just another opinion: I believe the original phrase was:
"If you think XXXX, you've got another THING coming." But somewhere along the
line it mutated to "...you've got another THINK coming." I first heard "think"
used by a Disney character.
: : : : : : : : : I know how you folks love documentation,
but I don't have any. But this one is in very current usage so we should get by
without doc. : : : : : : : : : When someone says that they think this or that
and you believe them to be wrong, you say "well, if you think that, then you've
got another think comming." In my house we spoke better Enlish than that. When
someone said, I think this or I thought that, we would say, you've got another
thought coming.
: : : : : : : : : ES
: : : : : : : : I've just, while Googling
both phrases (results are oddly 6,640 for "got another thing coming" and 1,830
for "got another think coming"), discovered the following in our own archives,
courtesy of the learned Masakim. I hereby paste it in its entirety.
: : : :
: : : : *** snip ***
: : : : : : : : "You have another think coming"
: :
: : : : : : "If you think that, you have another think coming" means "You are
mistaken and will soon have to alter your opinion". This is now sometimes heard
with "thing" in place of "think", but "think" is the older version. Eric Partridge,
in A Dictionary of Catch Phrases, gives the phrase as "you have another guess
coming", "US: since the 1920s, if not a decade or two earlier". Clearly "think"
is closer to "guess" than "thing" is. The OED gives a citation with "think" from
1937, and no evidence for "thing". Merriam-Webster Editorial Department writes:
"When an informal poll was conducted here at Merriam-Webster, about 60% of our
editors favored 'thing' over 'think,' a result that runs counter to our written
evidence." : : : : : : : : From The alt.usage.english FAQ File
: : : : :
: : : *** end snip ***
: : : : : : : : A couple of websites I visited claim
that this phrase is changing from its original deliberately and humorously ungrammatical
form to a grammatically correct form that misses the point - because people are
overly keen to avoid errors. However, most authorities, such as they are, seem
to go with "another think". I'd suspect that the phrase originally had slight
sarcastic overtones implying stupidity, similar perhaps to another deliberately
ungrammatical usage, as follows:-
: : : : : : : : "Elizabeth Taylor's got married
again - well gee, who'da thunk it?"
: : : : : : : Yes, I agree - it is deliberately
ungrammatical. Apropos of nothing in particular, a colleague of mine always signs
himself 'evil ditto lad' when agreeing with something - it's an anagram of his
name.
: : : : : : : I've only ever heard this as 'think' and, until now, wasn't
aware there was any debate about it. No evidence on offer from here, but doesn't
the think version have the advantage that it makes sense whereas the thing version
doesn't? What would the thing be but another thought anyway?
: : : : : : I don't
see that "thing" doesn't make sense. After all, the thing could be an event or
a rude awakening and needn't be simply another though. I actually had never come
across the "think" version until this discussion, but then it's not something
I recall seeing in print. Especially in the United States where consonants tend
to be softer than the UK, I think one might be hard pressed to tell the difference
between the two versions just by listening.
: : : : : Maybe this in in use
in the US but no one I've ever heard in the UK uses 'thing' in that phrase. In
my view the thing version is just plain wrong, and possibly the result of mishearing
the phrase.
: : : : : I can't agree that the thing version makes any kind of
sense. "If you think that you've another thing coming" isn't grammatical. To have
another thing you need a previous thing.
: : : : : Mind you people are happy
to put their best foot forward, which implies they have three or more feet.
:
: : : Okay - just toying with this a little...
: : : : I'm not sure I see how
it's ungramatical, illogical and twisted, maybe. I mean when you consider that
"think" is verb and not noun, well isn't quibbling about "another thing" a bit
like the pot calling the kettle black? Especially since the "thing" could be a
thought? Is there a lesser of two evils where grammar is concerned?
: : : :
I haven't got strong feelings either way, but I'm not sure I can bring myself
to use "think" since I will inevitably feel like I am doing bad German accent.
Not that anyone else sounds like this. I think it's probably just my own phonetical
bugaboo. (buggaboo?)
: : : (Bugaboo). I feel morally obliged to point out that
"think" is indeed also a perfectly valid noun in its own right - "let me have
a think about that". This from the American Heritage Dictionary:-
: : : THINK :
: : NOUN: The act or an instance of deliberate or extended thinking; a meditation.
:
: : What's staggered me in all this is the almost 4 to 1 ratio of the clearly
incorrect "thing" version over the "think" version that Google turned up. Have
the do-gooders now turned from well-intentioned but utterly ridiculous political
correctness to a similar grammatical correctness? I think we should have a junta.
:
: I feel badly now. I swear I looked up "think" in the very same dictionary today
and couldn't find it listed as a noun. I think I need a sabbatical.
: "Think"
isn't a noun in the 1969 edition. Fallen must have a more recent one.
Thanks
for correcting "sabbatical" :) If anyone needs me I'll be in Tahiti with a copy
of "Spell Better Now!".
|