Posted by TheUnlurker on March 12, 2002
In Reply to: Electronic origins for "loop" posted by ESC on March 12, 2002
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : Our family has an email list and recently one person said: "sorry I have been lax in writing, but I have been 'out of pocket' the past couple weeks.
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : I understood what she meant - not functioning up to par - but I another family member who continually scrutinizes everything said it meant 'spending money out of our pocket' as in 'out of pocket expenses'.
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : I never for a minute thought that.
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : Comments welcome.
: : : : : : : : : : : : : I understand "out of pocket" the same way your other family member does: as describing casual outlays of cash or small expenditures, small in relation to bigger budget items. But, then, I too continually scrutinize everything.
: : : : : : : : : : : : It has another meaning. Out of pocket means something like out of communication, out of range. If I find something more specific, I'll post it.
: : : : : : : : : : : Found it.
: : : : : : : : : : : OUT OF POCKET - "Used in the Southwest for 'absent, unavailable.' 'I'll be out of pocket awhile, but I'll call you as soon as I can." From the "Happy Trails: Western Words and Sayings" chapter in the "Facts on File Dictionary of American Regionalisms: Local Expressions from Coast to Coast" by Robert Hendrickson (Facts on File, New York, 2000).
: : : : : : : : : : In the UK 'out of pocket' means that you have paid out for something and not had an equivalent return, such as paying for business expenses and your boss not giving back to you what you actually paid out.
: : : : : : : : : An equivalent UK phrase for not feeling or functioning up to par would be "out of sorts". As has been mentioned above, over here, "out of pocket" exclusively refers to having been left at a financial disadvantage.
: : : : : : : : ... around 1974 "out of pocket"
also started being used to mean "out of touch" or "unavailable." No one seems
to know exactly why this sense arose or what the "pocket" in this case might be.
Personally, I suspect that it's a bad translation of some French phrase. In any
case, this sense of "out of pocket" is not, as far as I can tell, widely used.
A more common phrase meaning the same thing is "out of the loop," which first
appeared around 1983 and is probably rooted in computer terminology.
: : : : : : : : From The Word Detective (Jan 20, 2000)
: : : : : : : : ... *out of
pocket* has come to mean 'unreachable, absent, unavailable'. Lurking on the Internet
discussion group "alt.usage.english," I'm convinced that this "newer" meaning
is at least 25 years old, originally not too common, but now increasingly used
over a wide area. In fact the *Dictionary of American Regional English* promises
*out of pocket* as a "coming attraction" in the forthcoming Volume IV. Their draft
entry is labeled "Chiefly South and South Midland," a regional distribution that
includes southern states (such as Georgia and Alabama), and states just above
this region (such as Tennessee and Kentucky). However, I would add that *out of
pocket* is also used in Hawaii (thank you!), on the West Coast, in the Midwest
and West (especially in Texas), and even in the Northeast (such as in the financial
districts of New York City). ...
: : : : : : : : The phrase *out of pocket* also means 'out of place; out of order', and often describes unacceptable behavior or situations. This meaning has its roots in Black English of the 1940s, and refers to the pockets on a pool table. An example from a recent edition of *The Los Angeles Times*: "Any outsider who would attempt to engage in that conversation would be out of pocket."
: : : : : : : : From The Mavens' Word of the Day (May 22, 2001)
: : : : : : : I always agree with what the Word Detective says, but not this time. "Out of the loop" is used here (West Coast, U.S.) of someone who is excluded, intentionally or not, from communications within a group, often in grapevine form. You are out of the loop if most people in your office knew about the meeting in advance and you didn't. -- rb
: : : : : : I remember seeing a cartoon up in someone's office. "Out of the loop? I didn't even know there was a loop."
: : : : : For what it's worth, the UK interpretation of "out of the loop" matches exactly with R Berg's understanding - which is unsurprising, since I believe the expression to have come to us from across the pond. I am pretty sure that its origins are electronic or computational in origin too - a component that is literally "out of the loop" will of course not function and will play no part in either the reception, the processing or the retransmittal of data.
: : : : : However, in a spirit of kindness to The Word Detective, maybe its claim for "out of the loop" is based on a subtly different interpretation of "out of touch". "Out of touch" can of course mean too far away to be contacted, but it can also mean "not aware of what's going on" or "unable to relate to", as in "the government is entirely out of touch with the feelings of younger voters". This then becomes a little closer to the meaning of "out of the loop" - it's not entirely satisfactory, though.
: : : : "Electronic or computational in origin"--Aha. So the original loop was an electrical circuit?
: : : That'd be my bet, or possibly a programming loop... you know, the sort of thing with all those if/then/and/nand/nor logical operands that I do not understand. Programmers I understand can add or remove chunks of code from a loop.
: : Maybe. I hold open the possibility that it could be non-electronic, too. It's easy enough to see a loop in "HQ sends instuctions to field salespeople, who test out the approach, and send back suggested improvements which can be consolidated and re-submitted...." This kind of thing happens all the time in the management of hierarchical organizations. Acommunications loop. Pity the poor middle manager who isn't consulted ...
: You know the game "Gossip" -- people sit in a circle and a message is whispered from person to person until it reaches the originator. The object is to see how the message changes while making the round. I've always pictured "the loop" like that -- people communicating. Minus the garbled message, I would hope.
I speak as a programmer (so next time I'm hateful to someone maybe you'll understand why).
I can't believe "Out of the loop" could refer to program control structures (for the bored/boring the commonest loops are "for"-loops or "while"-loops, the former loop a specified number of times, the latter loop as long as some specified condition is met) -- it just doesn't make sense in the context of a programmers lot.
Either a subroutine belongs inside a loop (hence it would be performed once for each iteration (traversal of the loop)) or not. It is nearly inconceivable to think that I might one day say "ooh, look, THAT subroutine is out of the loop" and be surprised by it.
BUT, software (in common with other types of product) is often created in what is called a "development cycle", a *very* simple model of which could be:
The "testing" phase will identify either
bugs or "gaps" in the functionality that in themselves constitute "requirements",
hence, go to the top and start over. Repeat until you think you can hoodwink the
customers into paying.
Involved in this loop would be Customers, Sales, Support, Testers, Programmers.
It is not unusual for one or more of these entities to be outside the cycle, and to complain bitterly so.
Anyway, I don't believe that this is the origin either.
I throw my hat into the ring and declare that the phrase may come from early sequencers (synthersizers), where oscillators and other doodahs are connected serially or in parallel according to dark and mysterious (i.e. non-obvious) settings on the control panel. I know from my own "experiments" that often you'll be tweaking a control wondering why it has no effect on the output, only to realise that it is NOT used in the circuit (hence is literally "out of the loop").