Why not?

I've just posted something here using the past participle of the verb "to benefit" and it's reminded me of an unresolved argument I had many moons ago.

I'm admittedly both British and a linguist and so therefore undoubtedly obsessive beyond redemption, but every single bone in my body instinctually screams for me to spell the word "benefitted" with two t's. Similarly, were I ever to use the perfect tense of the verb "to target", I'd type "I have targetted" without so much as a second thought simply because without the double "t", the preceding vowel would be pronounced as strong - "kitten" versus "kite", if you like. I am sure there are other multisyllabic verbs ending in a vowel + t which I'd treat similarly.

What's the general view on this? Two t's or one? Or is it another transatlantic "vive la différence" thing?

I am horrified but not shocked to learn these words *don't* have two "t's". Illogical spellings, camel-befuddling exceptions to the rules... Isn't that just the joy of English? :)

affectionately,

Camel

Go with the two consonants and damn the torpedoes, say I

They've certainly had their laughs on me. Still Is "Laughter is the best revenge" a phrase? If not it should be.

Camel
Who wonders if there is a god of spelling