Re: "No Balls"

Posted by Christine on April 22, 2001

In Reply to: Re: "No Balls" posted by R. Berg on April 22, 2001

: : : : Can anyone shed any light on the phrase "

: : : Your understanding is correct--"a lack of courage".
: : : Just a guess but I think the origin is quite sexist.
: : : In the US women are discriminated against in jobs, pay and status. They are second class citizens to males.
: : : The phrase is a reference to a woman's lack of a scrotum and, therefore, her lack of status since she does not have the ability to produce testosterone, that manly of all manly body chemicals.

: : We can fix this. How about -- "You don't have the ovaries to do that." Or, if someone is cowardly, call him or her "t*tless." What do you think?

: I think the metaphor arose from a comparison between men and little boys, not between men and women, and is based on external anatomy, not on endocrine physiology. This belief is totally intuitive. I have no evidence to back it up.

I agree with R.Berg. It's rarely used towards woman. It is usually used towards men to demasculate them.

• Re: "No Balls" Barney 04/23/01
  • Re: All about balls ESC 04/23/01
    • Re: All about balls Bob 04/23/01