|
|
Re: Re: 'Under separate cover'Posted by R. Berg on December 09, 2006 In Reply to: Re: Re: 'Under separate cover' posted by Steve E on December 08, 2006 : : : Re: 'Under separate cover' : : : Many thanks, R.Berg, but I worded my question wrongly. I really wanted to know the history of the phrase e.g. what does the cover refer to? : : : Cheers, : : : Tintageu : : I would expect "the cover" to refer to whatever enclosed, or covered, the letter. I did not find "separate cover" in the OED; the closet I came was this. : : It is possible that the concept long antedates the first example of "cover" given here. But I can't imagine how you would find the first person who : The phrase "cover letter" comes to mind. That phrase was used very frequently in my younger days to mean (in a business environment) the letter that you typed when you sent out other documents to someone via the mail. For example, if you were sending out copies of contracts to be signed, you would prepare a "cover letter" to accompany those documents. I have not heard anyone in the younger generation where I work use the term at all. Could it be that the phrase "under separate cover" was originally "under separate cover letter" and over time it became shortened? For what it's worth. I don't believe "under separate cover" and "cover letter" are related quite so closely. Documents under separate covers come in separate packages. "Cover letter" is still in use (a person sending a résumé or a manuscript may write one), and a faxed document may be preceded by a faxed cover sheet. ~rb |