|
|
Re: Fem equiv of "ladies' man"Posted by Divyesh on December 13, 2004 In Reply to: Re: Fem equiv of "ladies' man" posted by lneilbuss@earthlink.net on November 19, 2004 : : : (Gary--I hope it's ok to lift a thread like this from the archive; it's just that this one didn't get much input before disappearing) : : : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : : While "coquette," "vamp," and the like suggest only flirting; "siren," "seductress," et al bring to mind also sexual activity. : : : The closest I have come so far is the slang, "player," which however is de facto applied to men not women. It is as if mankind (or at least the word purveyors) cannot conceive of a woman who dates many men, or plays the field, without her being a slut : : : : I think Dale, it's just one of those imbalances in our social thinking (historically anyway). Don't forget in 'those' days you were allowed to differentiate between men and women. : : : : BUT - it's all part of the history of our language and who we were and the foundation that's lead to who we are now. : : : Lap, well put--DH : : I think this belongs to the French, thus; try "femme fatale" : [] I am writing a dissertation on the development of the femme fatale from Jacobean Drama to modern film. It's a slippery phrase to pin down... anything from"dangerously attractive woman" through to "disastrous woman" or "fatal woman" seems to go. However, "femme fatale" as an institution in literature seems to go beyond this. Any further suggestions would be most welcome |