|
|
Re: DefinitionsPosted by R. Berg on November 11, 2003 In Reply to: Re: Definitions posted by ESC on November 11, 2003 : : Is "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" the precise phrase? If so, what exactly does it mean? Who conined the phrase? And is it still taught as a correct principle in biology? : : : : : : Ahem : : : : : Meaning something like 'birds of a feather flock together' is it? : : : : No, not that. It means that an individual goes through a succession of stages in its development that resembles the stages of development that its species went through when evolving. For example, human fetuses at one (early) stage of development have gills. : : : : I don't know who coined the phrase or whether the principle is still thought to be correct. : : : R.Berg's explanation is correct. The concept, however, is wrong, although it still appears in many textbooks even today. The German biologist Ernst Haeckel coined the phrase (as well as the word 'phylogeny') near the end of the 19th C. For more information, see http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/haeckel.html as a starting place. You'll find more by googling on the phrase, or on Haeckel's name; but be aware that 75% of what you'll find online is total BS; look for sites sponsored by univerities. : : When googling use 'site:edu' as one of the required search phrases to get mostly universities and fewer BS hits. : : : From Merriam-Webster online: : Main Entry: cre.a.tion.ism : Main Entry: evo.lu.tion : I am a Bible-thumping fundamentalist who believes that Genesis describes how God created the World and, through evolution, its creatures. Have I created a new theory? I need a name for it. It isn't just creationists who reject Haeckel's theory, it's mainstream biologists. However, human embryos do have gills and tails, and occasionally these structures aren't completely reabsorbed before birth. Some people have extra nipples, too, a reminder that many mammal species have litters to nurse. In that way, ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny, just not in all other ways.
|