|
|
Giving us pausePosted by R. Berg on January 04, 2003 In Reply to: Re: Scansion afterthought posted by TheFallen on January 04, 2003 : : : : : : : In Reply to: Re: Scanning posted by R. Berg on December 27, 2002 : : : : : : : :
: : : : : : : : The full Scottish proverb: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Is it just me? I
can't make this scan: : : : : : : : : : It does scan. There are twelve beats per line. The word "swords" lasts for just one beat not two. : : : : : : : : The part that gives me trouble is "wear one by my side": its length and pattern of accents. It doesn't divide into DA-da-da like the rest. And the first line has only ten syllables. Are you counting more than one beat for some syllables? "If wi-shes were ho-or-ses, beg-gars would ri-ide"? : : : : : : : Sorry, I wasn't too clear. The verse is some sort of amphibrachic tetrameter, I think, which is short-long-short four times per line. The uppercase syllables below are stressed: : : : : : : : "If WISHes were HORSes, BEGgars
would RIDE. : : : : : : : When you say the second line, do not pause at all. Ignore the comma. It scans. Really. : : : : : : I ain't buyiin' it. I don't think there are 12 syllables in any of those lines. (Of course, I kept my shoes on, so counting to 12 is a challenge for me.) : : : : : Bob, let's lose that counting method anyway. It's confusing. I never know whether to include in the total the finger I'm counting the other fingers with. : : : : : Mr.
or Ms. Fullstop, it didn't occur to me to stress ONE. I stressed WEAR, as in speech: : : : : Rats without internal cumbustion engines. And it served them right. : : : What wonderful technical terms - and I thought medicine was complex!! : : I was going to post on this one earlier, but couldn't dredge up all the necessary technical terms from my memory. The anonymous Dot is exactly right with his/her display of where the stresses fall, and nearly right with his/her terminology. : : The first two lines are strictly speaking each three amphibrachs (ta-TUM-tum) followed by a single iamb (ta-TUM). The last two lines are much easier to spot, each clearly consisting of four simple iambs (ta-TUM). : : There's potential difficulty in seeing this in both lines one and two. Line one has a mute beat in it as follows:- : : "if WI-shes / were HOR-ses,/ * BEG-gars / would RIDE" : : Reading it clearly requires a pause after the comma by the reader, and then it scans perfectly. : : Contrarily, the second line requires no pause and indeed an elision across two words, thus:- : : "if TUR-nips / were SWORDS-i'd / wear ONE by / my SIDE" : : It's the "swordsid" that's presenting the problems. : Of course, the problem's entirely solved if the first line has over the years lost a word, thus : "if WI-shes / were HOR-ses, / (then) BEG-gars / would RIDE" : It's not an essential, but it may help clarify the metric beat and where to pause if you silently add it. I agree about the pause after "horses." I think there must be a similar pause after "ride." With those two pauses, the first two lines together fit a 3/4 rhythm--except that accenting "one" still seems unnatural to me.
|