|
|
Re: Scanning? I think not.Posted by James Briggs on January 04, 2003 In Reply to: Re: Scanning? I think not. posted by Bob on January 04, 2003 : : : : In Reply to: Re: Scanning posted by R. Berg on December 27, 2002 : : : : : :
: : : : : : : The full Scottish proverb: : : : : : : : : : : : Is it just me? I can't make this scan: : : : : : : It does scan. There are twelve beats per line. The word "swords" lasts for just one beat not two. : : : : : The part that gives me trouble is "wear one by my side": its length and pattern of accents. It doesn't divide into DA-da-da like the rest. And the first line has only ten syllables. Are you counting more than one beat for some syllables? "If wi-shes were ho-or-ses, beg-gars would ri-ide"? : : : : Sorry, I wasn't too clear. The verse is some sort of amphibrachic tetrameter, I think, which is short-long-short four times per line. The uppercase syllables below are stressed: : : : : "If WISHes were HORSes, BEGgars would
RIDE. : : : : When you say the second line, do not pause at all. Ignore the comma. It scans. Really. : : : I ain't buyiin' it. I don't think there are 12 syllables in any of those lines. (Of course, I kept my shoes on, so counting to 12 is a challenge for me.) : : Bob, let's lose that counting method anyway. It's confusing. I never know whether to include in the total the finger I'm counting the other fingers with. : : Mr. or Ms. Fullstop, it didn't occur to me to stress ONE.
I stressed WEAR, as in speech: : Rats without internal cumbustion engines. And it served them right. What wonderful technical terms - and I thought medicine was complex!!
|