|
|
Re: Scanning? I think not.Posted by R. Berg on January 03, 2003 In Reply to: Re: Scanning? I think not. posted by Bob on January 03, 2003 : : In Reply to: Re: Scanning posted by R. Berg on December 27, 2002 : : : : : : : : : : : The
full Scottish proverb: : : : : : : : : : Is it
just me? I can't make this scan: : : : : It does scan. There are twelve beats per line. The word "swords" lasts for just one beat not two. : : : The part that gives me trouble is "wear one by my side": its length and pattern of accents. It doesn't divide into DA-da-da like the rest. And the first line has only ten syllables. Are you counting more than one beat for some syllables? "If wi-shes were ho-or-ses, beg-gars would ri-ide"? : : Sorry, I wasn't too clear. The verse is some sort of amphibrachic tetrameter, I think, which is short-long-short four times per line. The uppercase syllables below are stressed: : : "If WISHes
were HORSes, BEGgars would RIDE. : : When you say the second line, do not pause at all. Ignore the comma. It scans. Really. : I ain't buyiin' it. I don't think there are 12 syllables in any of those lines. (Of course, I kept my shoes on, so counting to 12 is a challenge for me.) Bob, let's lose that counting method anyway. It's confusing. I never know whether to include in the total the finger I'm counting the other fingers with. Mr. or Ms. Fullstop, it didn't occur to me to stress
ONE. I stressed WEAR, as in speech:
|